Journal of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies
The Journal of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (ISSN 2330-5142) presents papers that cover all aspects of the management and conservation of inland, estuarine, and marine fisheries and wildlife. It aims to provide a forum where fisheries and wildlife managers can find innovative solutions to the problems facing our natural resources in the 21st century. The Journal welcomes manuscripts that cover scientific studies, case studies, and review articles on a wide range of topics of interest and use to fish and wildlife managers, with an emphasis on the southeastern United States.
3076 - 3100 of 4810 articles | 25 per page | page 124
A dissertation designed to support the assertion that stringent regulatory measures are necessary and justified to control the importation, transportation, possession, sale or release of any wildlife in the territorial limits of the State of Georgia. The growing tendency of the general public to seek out every source of wildlife on a world-wide basis, then attempt to convert these into household pets has caused this State to initiate aggressive action to regulate and control. It is the purpose oftbis paper to identify the procedure established to that end.
An interview study of one hundred and forty-eight admitted illegal deer hunters was conducted to determine the behavioral aspects and methodology of deer jacking activity. Through structured interviews given at individual and group sessions, the characteristics of the violator and the methods of operation were determined. The results have immediate law enforcement and information and education implications.
Despite the fact that approximately one third of the state wildlife agency personnel and funding is invested in law enforcement, scientific law enforcement studies are comparatively few. A regional program of law enforcement research, to be located at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Virginia, can coordinate projects, allow publication of results in many forms, avoid duplication of research projects, and answer more questions for less money in a joint effort than can individual states. The success and benefits of this program relies on funding by all states, since all states will benefit from this research. The program will enhance ideas and open communication between researchers and wildlife law enforcement agencies. With this proposed system of jointly funded research, states can save money in the long run, make great interactive advances, and achieve regional leadership in a new, vital essential dimension of modem wildlife resource management.
The wildlife officer, whether he be called a conservation officer, game protector, game and fish enforcement officer or simply game warden, must be a real professional. He needs most of the knowledge that a professional policeman needs. He also needs a working knowledge of many subjects peculiar to the out-of-doors. The breakthrough in training that has already occurred for police should be immediately extended to wildlife law enforcement officers. This. coupled with maintenance of high standards and increases in pay, should do much to professionalize this important occupation.
The following paper is a summary of the planning. operation, and results of the first highly successful roadblock used by the Enforcement Division of the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission. It was held at the junction of Arkansas Highways 53 and 24. about twelve miles south of Prescott, Arkansas, in Nevada County. This roadblock resulted in thirty·one arrests and $3,826.00 in fines and court costs for game and fish violations.
This essay deals with the regulatory function common to all wildlife resource management agencies, and addresses this process specifically from the public relations aspect. It is hoped that these thoughts will stimulate thinking on the parts of both I &. E personnel and top-level administrators on how to better utilize the regulatory publication to put forward agency goals and programs.
Data available in the four national surveys of fishing and hunting (1955, 1960, 1965, 1970) were used to identify how participation in fishing and hunting has changed during the recent environmental movement. Participation in fishing has increased in nearly all segments of the population while participation in hunting has remained the same or may have decreased slightly. Participation in small game hunting decreased while participation in big game and waterfowl hunting increased. A decrease in participation in hunting was most notable in rural areas among farmers and farm laborers. The data in the national surveys did not indicate that an increased environmental awareness has influenced participation in fishing or hunting any substantial degree.