Comparison of Three Ladino Clovers Used for Food Plots in Northeastern Georgia

We compared production, utilization, and protein levels of 3 ladino clovers (Trifolium repens) in northeastern Georgia. Three 0.2-ha clover plots were planted side by side in 2 separate fields on Chestatee Wildlife Management Area. Samples were clipped, weighed, and analyzed monthly for a 26-month period beginning in April 1990. All clovers were utilized very heavily by deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and other wildlife averaging 392 kg/ha per month dry weight totalling 10,210 kg/ha for the study. With data for both fields combined, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in wildlife (predominantly deer) usage among the 3 varieties: Regal (428 kg/ha/month), Imperial Whitetail Mix (383 kg/ha/month), or Osceola (367 kg/ha/ month). Overall use of all varieties was higher in a field (P < 0.01) with no other food plots were nearby. Highest monthly use occurred in June 1990 (1,107 kg/ha/month), May 1990 (974 kg/ha/month), August 1990 (887 kg/ha/month), and October 1990 (798 kg/ha/month). Production of Osceola (1,422 kg/ha/month) was highest of the 3 {P < 0.01). For both fields combined, May, August, and September were the months of highest production. Differences in height inside and outside exclosures were not significantly different (P > 0.05) by clover variety. Height differences were most apparent in November (54%), March (51 %), and October (51 %). All varieties averaged approximately 24% protein content. All varieties and mixes tested made excellent food plots for deer and other wildlife for at least 3 years. However, there were large differences in price. Regal ladino was the most economical followed by Big Buck (Osceola) and Imperial Whitetail (Regal and California Ladino Mixture).

Starting page
44
Ending page
52
ID
23440